If leadership had a theme for 2026, it would be this: We’ve reached saturation. Work is busier, noisier and more crowded than ever, and most organizations are still trying to solve problems by layering on even more.
Yet, in my experience as a coach, speaker and facilitator, the leaders making real progress are the ones who are boldly doing the opposite. They’re choosing to remove, refine and simplify, turning subtraction into a strategy.
Humans have a strong ‘addition bias’, and when faced with a challenge, we instinctively try to fix it by adding something new (projects, platforms and KPIs) and overlook the possibility that removing something may be the smarter path.
It’s an understandable instinct because adding feels active and productive, and subtracting feels risky, like taking away a safety net. Let’s face it, no-one gets employee of the month for suggesting we stop doing something.
Leadership roles today involve colossal amounts of information. We hop between meetings, messages, dashboards and documents without a moment to think. Our brains were not built for this level of input.
Stanford University research found that when people juggle too much information, their ability to filter distractions and make good decisions declines dramatically. Leaders may believe they are being efficient by doing more, but the science tells a very different story.
When faced with a challenge, we instinctively try to fix it by adding something new and overlook the possibility that removing something may be the smarter path.
This is why organizations that intentionally remove noise see such dramatic results. Finland’s education system works on this principle, giving students more unstructured time, which leads to higher learning outcomes. A global study published in MIT Sloan Management Review found that companies that introduced meeting-free days saw productivity jump by more than 70 percent and stress levels drop significantly.
Simply removing meetings created clearer thinking and better work. Subtraction works because it gives the brain space to do what it does best.
In 2019, the World Health Organization formally recognized burnout as a workplace phenomenon and for good reason. Burnout isn’t caused by an individual’s lack of resilience but by systems that ask people to carry more than is reasonable. When the COVID-19 pandemic arrived, the pressure intensified and exhaustion became the norm.
Yet many organizations responded by offering more tools, more training and more initiatives. The intention was good, but the outcome was predictable. Adding more to an already overloaded workforce doesn’t fix burnout. Removing unnecessary, streamlining processes and creating space does, though.
Strategic subtraction is the act of removing anything that no longer adds value, even if it once did. It means questioning long-standing habits and structures rather than automatically maintaining them. It means regularly asking, “Is this still serving us, or is it simply familiar?”
This kind of thinking often gets overlooked because it’s less visible than launching something new, but leaders who master subtraction create teams that move faster and think more clearly. Subtraction removes friction, reduces confusion and focuses energy.
Across the globe, companies experimenting with the four-day workweek have shown what’s possible when subtraction is taken seriously. These organizations cut one day from the week while keeping pay and expectations the same. Productivity increased while stress decreased, and teams became sharper about priorities because unnecessary tasks could no longer be afforded.
The success wasn’t due to people working harder on the remaining days. It came from removing inefficiencies that had been accepted as normal; for example, meetings were shortened or eliminated, processes were streamlined and work became more intentional.
Companies experimenting with the four-day workweek have shown what’s possible when subtraction is taken seriously.
Other organizations, such as Atlassian, intentionally retire projects periodically to create space for newer, more relevant work. They treat ‘stopping’ as a discipline, not an admission of failure. It’s one of the clearest examples of subtraction driving innovation.
Letting go can feel uncomfortable. It can feel like undoing progress rather than unlocking it, but the most effective leaders know that their job is not to preserve everything that once worked. Their job is to clear space for what comes next.
The leaders who will thrive in this next era won’t be the ones with the fullest calendars or the longest to-do lists; they will be the ones who practice discernment. They will make decisions that simplify rather than complicate, valuing space as much as urgency. They will know that saying (and accepting) no is the smartest way to protect what matters most.
Great leadership is about creating the conditions for better thinking and better work, and subtraction is how you get there. It brings clarity, reduces friction and allows teams to focus on what truly moves the needle.
The sharpest strategic move is not adding the big, shiny next thing, but removing the one that no longer earns its place.
Donna McGeorge
Contributor Collective Member
Donna McGeorge is a productivity expert and bestselling author of ‘The First 2 Hours’. She helps leaders and teams make work work through practical strategies that reclaim time and sharpen impact. Her new book, ‘Red Brick Thinking,’ explores the art of strategic subtraction. Learn more at https://donnamcgeorge.com